Re: 2.6.9: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 13:44 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> It's bad enough that the kernel developers don't care about backward 
> compatibility or want to provide a binary API, but hardware vendors can 
> at least deal with those situations.  But now the Fedora developers want 
> HW vendors to tell their customers that they all need to recompile the 
> kernel as well?  

No as a fedora developer I'm telling you that you MUST NOT compile a
kernel if you want to compile your module for the fedora kernel. You
tried so anyway (otherwise you didn't need the .config) and it went
wrong. No surprise there.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux