The difference here I think is not between 0 & NULL but
between an integer & a pointer. On a 64 bit system while
int is still 4 bytes, the pointer could be (because I had read
somewhere that some 64 bit archs use 32 bit pointers
in some cases) 8 bytes. I think you should be comparing
between -
int *p = NULL & int *p = 0
rather than with,
int p = 0
regards,
Kishore A K
--
"Dream as if you'll live forever; Live as if you'll die today."
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:35:22 +0530, Vishal Soni <vishal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I remember a big discussion happening on LKML on this
> > topic (i.e., NULL vs 0) a couple of months back. It must
> > be still available in their mail archives. Try googling for
> > "Use NULL instead of integer 0" & you must find it. Must
> > say it was a pretty heated discussion. Dont know what
> > the outcome was. I stopped following it after sometime.
> Tried some thing and pasting a copy here...which tells clearly abt NULL
> pointer and using zero(integer)
> C code -- used
> file name : null.c
> int main()
> {
> int *p= NULL;
> return 0;
> }
>
> file name : zero.c
> int main()
> {
> int p = 0;
> return 0;
> }
>
> Assembly snippet on 64 bit machine for null.c
> main:
> .LFB3:
> pushq %rbp
> .LCFI0:
> movq %rsp, %rbp
> .LCFI1:
> movq $0, -8(%rbp) <------------
> movl $0, %eax
> leave
> ret
>
> Assembly snippet on 64 bit machine for zero.c
> main:
> .LFB3:
> pushq %rbp
> .LCFI0:
> movq %rsp, %rbp
> .LCFI1:
> movl $0, -4(%rbp) <-------------
> movl $0, %eax
> leave
> ret
> Check out the 7th line..... of both the snippets
> If we see here 8 bytes are deducted from base pointer(in 64 bit machine --
> when variable p was NULL pointer)
> and 4 bytes are deducted from rbp when p was integer....(obvious... Right
> !!!!)
> and thus the code differs.......
>
> Whereas in 32 bit machine, assembly snippets for null.c and zero.c are
> similar.
> main:
> pushl %ebp
> movl %esp, %ebp
> subl $8, %esp
> andl $-16, %esp
> movl $0, %eax
> addl $15, %eax
> addl $15, %eax
> shrl $4, %eax
> sall $4, %eax
> subl %eax, %esp
> movl $0, -4(%ebp)
> movl $0, %eax
> leave
> ret
>
> Interesting conclusions and concept to imbibe :)
> Regards,
> Vishal.
>
>
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
