Re: How is NULL pointer dereference handled inside kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I remember a big discussion happening on LKML on this 
topic (i.e., NULL vs 0) a couple of months back. It must 
be still available in their mail archives. Try googling for 
"Use NULL instead of integer 0" & you must find it. Must
say it was a pretty heated discussion. Dont know what
the outcome was. I stopped following it after sometime.

--
Kishore A K


On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:02:46 -0800, Nish Aravamudan
<nish.aravamudan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:44:44 +0530, Kishore A K <kishoreak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > NULL == 0 in all currently known architectures while coding in
> > C. And I think NULL == (void *)0 if you code in C++. Infact in
> > many places in the linux kernel source NULL & 0 have been used
> > interchangably.
> 
> I suppose if it's consistent in every file, it probably isn't a big
> deal, but it seems like it might be a good idea to be consistent
> across the kernel. CodingStyle has no recommendation on this
> particular issue. What do people think? Kishore, could you provide a
> specific example?
> 
> -Nish
>

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux