On Sun, 2003-12-28 at 15:45, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > In that case, you might want to post it after all, since 2.95 is still > the recommended kernel compiler. However, I find it strange that no > one complained about 2.95 breaking with it, while many people > complained about 2.96. However, I recommend you check yet again - I > just checked with 2.95 and it works for me. there are many flavours of 2.95 (including official fsf releases like 2.95.1, 2.95.2 and .3 and .4; anything below .3 is known to miscompile the kernel; also distros like debian ship a fixed up 2.95)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
