Re: 2.6.0 Compilation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 02:58:16PM +0200, yuvalt@actcom.net.il wrote:

> I saw several patches regarding this issue in test8-10, but none of
> them worked (those patches split the big sprintf call to 3 smaller
> sprintf calls while the issue was with the inline function call).
> And yes, both 2.96 and 2.95 failed to compile this.

In that case, you might want to post it after all, since 2.95 is still
the recommended kernel compiler. However, I find it strange that no
one complained about 2.95 breaking with it, while many people
complained about 2.96. However, I recommend you check yet again - I
just checked with 2.95 and it works for me. 

Cheers, 
Muli 
-- 
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/

"the nucleus of linux oscillates my world" - gccbot@#offtopic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux