Re: DMA Vs Programmed IO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > > > > But quite often if DMA fails for some reson it will
> > > > > > try to fall back to PIO something working slowly
> > > > > > can be better than not working at all.
> > > > >  Is it always useful (even for the small data transfer) to use DMA
?
> > > >
> > > > for small transfere it can have the same over head to set up
> > > > the dma transfere as it does to transfere the data in a case
> > > > like this there it no point in using DMA
> > >
> > > But remember disks are always accessed in terms of blocks and they are
> > > 512 bytes. Thus the question stands, is DMA setup faster than sending
> > > 512 bytes to the bus?
> >
> > who said anything about a disk ?
> > what about sending a small packet to a nic ?
> > or some other information somewhere else
>
> Well, yes. So we could ask what is the critical size to use DMA...

again that really goes back to a hardware specific as some hardware
can be easyier / less overhead to setup a DMA transfere than others.

i think it really comes down to which ever is fastest for the
specific hardware and its current events.





--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux