Re: DMA Vs Programmed IO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:50:06AM -0000, James Stevenson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > But quite often if DMA fails for some reson it will
> > > > > try to fall back to PIO something working slowly
> > > > > can be better than not working at all.
> > > >  Is it always useful (even for the small data transfer) to use DMA ?
> > >
> > > for small transfere it can have the same over head to set up
> > > the dma transfere as it does to transfere the data in a case
> > > like this there it no point in using DMA
> >
> > But remember disks are always accessed in terms of blocks and they are
> > 512 bytes. Thus the question stands, is DMA setup faster than sending
> > 512 bytes to the bus?
> 
> who said anything about a disk ?
> what about sending a small packet to a nic ?
> or some other information somewhere else

Well, yes. So we could ask what is the critical size to use DMA...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux