On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 17:33, Sridhar N wrote: > On Tuesday 09 April 2002 12:17, Frank Schaefer wrote: > > > Not what i want. It ( so does SNARE)supports *specific* syscalls, but > > > not the generic one i want to build. > > > > what the hell is a GENERIC SYSCALL ?????????? > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Nothng that i know of. Looks like u didn't get my drift. Currently, all the Right, I didn't read the whole thread -- sorry. > logging tools that i know of - SNARE, syscalltrack - support logging of > specific syscalls - read,write,exec etc. What they do is a kernel module > that presumably "hijacks" the call and logs it. It then passes it on to the > real syscall implementation. My point is to log all syscalls irrespective of > what they are.....One place i'm looking at is the entry.S, i'm looking at the > wrong place there, and i don't know which is the right place. Ravi's right. This IS definitively the place you should look in. Regards Frank -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
