Re: Generic System call handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 09 April 2002 12:17, Frank Schaefer wrote:
> > Not what i want.  It ( so does SNARE)supports *specific* syscalls, but
> > not the generic one i want to build.
>
> what the hell is a GENERIC SYSCALL ??????????
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Nothng that i know of. Looks like u didn't get my drift. Currently, all the 
logging tools that i know of - SNARE, syscalltrack -  support logging of 
specific syscalls - read,write,exec etc.  What they do is a kernel module 
that presumably "hijacks" the call and logs it. It then passes it on to the 
real syscall implementation.  My point is to log all syscalls irrespective of 
what they are.....One place i'm looking at is the entry.S, i'm looking at the 
wrong place there, and i don't know which is the right place.

--Sridhar
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux