Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
From: Serhii <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:16:20 +0000 (UTC)
In-reply-to: <20240418153254.65058b50@localhost>
References: <20240417194340.20430839@localhost> <7370616d-fa0a35c7-09c3-4db9-9b8c-03b944b73124-at.encryp.ch-74726170@at.encryp.ch> <20240418121340.58c1fa6e@localhost> <07f45d43-0ab0-42bf-87e2-9c8ce00bcdb6@linutronix.de> <20240418153254.65058b50@localhost>

No, nftables hooks are running too late to have similar performance as XDP/eBPF offers.

2024-04-18T15:33:34Z William N. <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> Then nftables can be used against DDoS with the BPF performance, right?

-- 
Send unsolicited bulk email to carle34@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
  - From: William N.

References:
- DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
  - From: William N.
- Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
  - From: Serg
- Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
  - From: William N.
- Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
  - From: Florian Kauer
- Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
  - From: William N.

Prev by Date: Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
Next by Date: Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
Previous by thread: Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
Next by thread: Re: DoS/DDoS protection for end nodes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux