Re: Forcing to accept packets on lower priorities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/22/19 11:47 AM, Philipp Richter wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have a question concerning the priority of chains as described here
> https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Configuring_chains#Base_chain_priority
> 
> If a lower priority chain accepts a packet it will still traverse the
> later priority chains. I wanted to cleanly separate tables for docker
> and/or libvirt, so packets that are accepted by those special lower
> priority tables shouldn't be reevaluated by the main chains.
> Is there a good way to achieve such clean separation using different
> tables ? One way I'd see is maybe marking the accepted packets and
> adding rules to the top of the chains that match that mark and accept
> those packets. But this looks like making this more complex than it
> needs to be if I can achieve the same thing by having the docker,
> libvirt chains in the main table (which is the case right now).
> Is there any better way ?
> 

You could try using different hooks, i.e, prerouting/filter and
forward/filter.

If you drop a packet in prerouting/filter it won't show up again in
forward/filter.

table ip t {
	chain p {
		type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept;
	}

	chain f {
		type filter hook forward priority 0; policy accept;
	}
}



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux