Re: No traction on default verdicts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/8/18 2:49 AM, Robert White wrote:
> So like a year ago I mentioned that being able to put a default verdict
> into a verdict map would be super helpful. Some interest was shown, but
> it didn't happen.
> 
> Clearly it doesn't have any meaning for other kinds of sets where you
> are matching a value as a truth-test, but for verdicts it's potentially
> a big deal.
> 
> 
> So something like this contrived example
> 
> ip protocol { tcp: jump tcp_tests,
>               udp: jump udp_tests,
>                 :: jump ip_sanitizer }
> 

This has been in my backlog for a while. Sadly, I didn't find time to
work on this and I'm not sure I will be able in the short term.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux