richard lucassen a écrit : > On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:08:41 +0100 > Pascal Hambourg <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On line 180 there is the "COMMIT" of the filter table. >> That sounds like expected behaviour. Where's the bug ? > > I'd say in iptables-restore. Apparently the -t (test) does not notice > that there is a problem while the real iptables-restore does. Sorry, my question was not clear enough. Let me rephrase. As -t does not commit the tables to the kernel, I do not expect it to detect errors related to the kernel configuration. So I do not see any bug in your description, it sounds like expected behaviour to me. Where do you see a bug in that behaviour ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
