Re: advanced routing with NAT: returning UDP traffic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



conntrack and conntrack ? i'm assuming this is a typo?

so, even some kind of odd udp reply will still be the same connection if it's 
within 30seconds?

so, i can use connmark on not just TCP, but on all protocols?

Regards,

Maarten

Op dinsdag 23 september 2014 20:41:08 schreef Eliezer Croitoru:
> Hey Maarten,
> 
> As long as I remember conntrack and conntrack are working together.
> Which means that udp traffic will be distinguished the same way as TCP
> as long the connection tracking categorized it under the same connection
> stream.
> (I think for unestablished connection 30 secs and more for an
> "established" one)
> 
> Eliezer
> 
> On 09/23/2014 03:46 PM, Maarten wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > until now, i've done multiple ISPs with nexthop default route, 2 extra
> > tables, ip rule and TCP connmark.
> > 
> > but, how does this involve UDP traffic...
> > 
> > if for example i have in my NAT LAN an NTP server, how would i get the udp
> > packet out the same interface where it was originally coming in from?
> > 
> > please advise...
> > 
> > Maarten
-- 
BA NV
IT & Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux