Re: Formal submission of Xtables2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As a disinterested third party*, I think Jan is voicing stronger arguments, 
and that Pablo may need to enhance his debating skills.

N

* Disinterested in that I don't have a bone to pick in this debate. I do have 
a few netfilter thoughts, though, concerning general usability enhancements to 
the facility: 32 bit connmarks can be rather limiting (64 bits would be far 
more adequate), integrated IPv4/IPv6 (it'd be nice to be able to specify both 
addresses for a node in a single rule, for dual-stacked nodes), and a way to 
explicitly include related conns in a rule (after establishment, there seems 
to be no way to associate a related conn with the rule that allowed it in the 
first place).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux