Re: Formal submission of Xtables2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 2012-12-17 15:30, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:

>On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>[...]
>> >So far, I haven't see any *strong reason* to drop nftables code
>> 
>> In all fairness, I have never said anything about dropping nft.
>> I am focused on xt2, its inclusion and subsequent maintenance, because 
>> it resolves the ipt shortcomings in a way that I think appeals most to 
>> the userspace crowd.
>
>I'm still not convinced but I want find a short-term compromise
>solution for this which does not involve tons of email. We'll announce
>the netfilter workshop soon, likely to happen at Q1 2013 depending on
>availability of the organizer, but maybe Q2 2013 (but not later), I
>think it's the place to debate your proposal and nftables, of course.
>
>I will not get anything into mainline until then.

Delaying this for more months is not a good idea, I think.

The amount of patches will grow as more features are implemented. If
there is an objection to a patch, then this can have implications for
all those that follow (not rebase conflicts, but actual
invalidating), which gets more painful the larger the patchset is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux