Le 31/03/2011 21:55, Jean-Philippe Menil a écrit :
That's what i tought, and i needed to be sure.
As i can miss the counters for the moment, i will kept my rules.
But as i'm very intereted by ipset, i will think to do otherwise.
Thanks a lot.
Regards.
Hi,
I return to this story of counters.
Since, i don't really need some counters, but just to know when there is
no more traffic for a user to decrement an idle timeout;
i decide to use ipset with the bitmap ip,mac and the timeout value.
However, the timeout doesn't do really what i need, i use a dirty hack
to set the timeout counters every time a packet is matched;
so when there are no more packet, the timeout value begin to decrement.
I do this in the bitmap_ipmac_ttest function, i'm just wondering if it
is the right place to do this?
Thanks for your advice.
Regards.
--
Jean-Philippe Menil - Pôle réseau Service IRTS
DSI Université de Nantes
jean-philippe.menil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tel : 02.53.48.49.27 - Fax : 02.53.48.49.09
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
