Re: Ipset counters question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 31/03/2011 21:24, Jozsef Kadlecsik a écrit :
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote:

Let me explain, in iptables, i have this in a mangle chain:

Chain WD_BG_Outgoing (1 references)
  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source destination
  238K   18M MARK       all  --  *      *       192.168.10.255 0.0.0.0/0
MAC F0:7B:CB:8C:6C:6F MARK set 0x2
  196K   12M MARK       all  --  *      *       192.168.11.214 0.0.0.0/0
MAC 00:25:00:4E:E3:B7 MARK set 0x2
  9436 3210K MARK       all  --  *      *       192.168.10.195 0.0.0.0/0
MAC F0:7B:CB:52:3D:BE MARK set 0x2
  289K   68M MARK       all  --  *      *       192.168.11.211 0.0.0.0/0
MAC 00:22:69:3D:4C:13 MARK set 0x2
  710K   40M MARK       all  --  *      *       192.168.10.34 0.0.0.0/0
MAC C8:0A:A9:45:E5:3D MARK set 0x2
1605K   93M MARK       all  --  *      *       192.168.11.155 0.0.0.0/0
MAC 00:26:6C:5A:0C:0A MARK set 0x2
81534   14M MARK       all  --  *      *       192.168.11.136 0.0.0.0/0
MAC 00:0F:B0:D6:1D:19 MARK set 0x2
  420K   26M MARK       all  --  *      *       192.168.11.149 0.0.0.0/0
MAC 00:24:21:44:FB:40 MARK set 0x2
13128 3437K MARK       all  --  *      *       192.168.10.186 0.0.0.0/0
MAC 00:26:5E:27:8C:33 MARK set 0x2

--snip--

If i use ipset, with rules like these:
ipset -N WEBAUTHIP bitmap:ip,mac --network 192.168.10.0/24
iptables -t mangle -I WD_BG_Outgoing -m set --set WEBAUTHIP src -j ACCEPT

And add clients with ipset -A WEBAUTHIP ip,mac

If i list my mangle chain (WD_BG_Outgoing), i will see only the counters for
the WEBAUTHIP match-set,
Chain WD_BG_Outgoing (0 references)
  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source destination
     111M     475M ACCEPT     all  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0    0.0.0.0/0
match-set WEBAUTHIP src

and i can't anymore check the counters by ip of my clients

The rules are collapsed into a single rule, so there are no more
individual counters. That's a tradeof and you have to decide which is more
important: less rules or counters.

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
           H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

That's what i tought, and i needed to be sure.

As i can miss the counters for the moment, i will kept my rules.
But as i'm very intereted by ipset, i will think to do otherwise.

Thanks a lot.

Regards.

--
Jean-Philippe Menil - Pôle réseau Service IRTS
DSI Université de Nantes
jean-philippe.menil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tel : 02.53.48.49.27 - Fax : 02.53.48.49.09
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux