Re: shaping vlans - revisited

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:24 -0200, Ethy H. Brito wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:24:05 +0000
> Andrew Beverley <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 12:05 -0200, Ethy H. Brito wrote:
> > > On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:59:16 +0000
> > > Andrew Beverley <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Stupid question - can you not just attach your qdisc to the vlan
> > > > interface and mark the traffic on the vlan interface as well, as if
> > > > it was eth1?  
> > > 
> > > You mean "tc qdisc add dev vlanX ..." + "iptables ... -j IPMARK ..." ??
> > > 
> > > No. This must not be done. I have now 6 vlans (3 for IPv4 and 3 for
> > >  IPv6) each pair to one ISP. The only way I know (if you guys know
> > >  another way, please advise) to shape *_global_* aggregated traffic for
> > >  each client is to attach to eth1 an not to individual vlans. 
> > > 
> > 
> > Could you use an IFB device? Or possibly even IMQ?
> 
> IFB?? 
> 
> it may be a good way out.
> Do you know any discussion list or forum for it? 

This list is probably a good place to start. There doesn't seem to be a
huge amount of information around for it, but I got a good response from
the author when I contacted him with a question a while back.

Andy


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux