I'm not sure I realise what you consider to be a problem. Anyway, FWIW we have several linux routers each with several hundred vlan-interfaces, I think about 600 at most currently. We are doing ip routing, but not bridging, for these. Not seeing any problems. /Oskar 2010/11/15 Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 11/15/10 05:02, Asher Awelan wrote: >> >> QUESTION: >> Is there a way to broute the vlans to the eth1 interface and not have to >> create every interface and register every vlan... or perhaps strip the vlan >> id (after logging of course)... > > It /might/ be possible to strip the VLAN tags and send the traffic on it's > way with out the need for all the vlan interfaces. But, I don't know that > it will be possible (at least as easily) to re-tag the returning traffic. > > Something you might consider doing is moving the (un)tagging / trunking in > to a user space application that can dynamically add and remove the VLAN > tags with out needing kernel support or vlan interfaces. - I'm just typing > raw theories out my (you know what) and would have to give this quite a bit > more thought. > > > > Grant. . . . > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
