On 06/30/2010 05:24 AM, ratheesh k wrote:
Let me try and understand this.
R is routing between 192.168.1.0/24 and 10.232.18.0/24.
As A is on the 192.168.1.0/24 side of R.
But to give A an 10.232.18.0/24 address (dynamically)?
Why?
For some clients , R should act as a mere bridge , Not a router .
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Simon Horman<horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:43:46PM +0530, ratheesh k wrote:
Hi,
A -------> R ------->S
I have a linux machine A is connected to Linux machine R . Machine R
is having two network interfaces and acting as a router .
It has a dhcp server running . It will assign ip in 192.168.1.0/24
subnet to all machine connected on lan side ( A is connected also in
lan side ) . Wan side of R is connected to HTTP server S . There is
also a DHCP server running on S to assign ip in 10.232.18.0/24 subnet
. Is there any way , in which NAT should be bypassed to get ip from
DHCP server running on S . My question is : How can A will get an ip
from 10.232.18.0/24 pool ip .?
ebtables is an option ? How can we make it ?
Is there any other optimal way ?
Let me try and understand this.
R is routing between 192.168.1.0/24 and 10.232.18.0/24.
As A is on the 192.168.1.0/24 side of R.
But to give A an 10.232.18.0/24 address (dynamically)?
Why?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Will dhcprelay work for you?
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
