Re: simple question about state vs conntrack modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:

>    recently i have read a nice documentation with some hints for making good
> rulesets .... and one caught my attention
> 
> http://jengelh.medozas.de/documents/Perfect_Ruleset.pdf
> 
> Towards the perfect ruleset
> Jan Engelhardt
> August 2009
> 
> 5 Modern extensions
> De-facto obsolete extensions:
> * -m state: replaced by -m conntrack
> 
>    i must confess i dont recall reading about state module being obsoleted by
> conntrack one ..... is that true ??? I know conntrack has more options ....
> but that it obsoleted state, that i dont remember ....

Technically the conntrack match supersedes - and so obsoletes - the state 
match. But practically the state match is not obsoleted in any way.

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux