Re: Problem with IPv6 tunnel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just for info, I report that after I "opened" protocol 41 for input
(and removed the nat table changes) my IPv6 tunnel is working fine for
more than 24 hours.

David

2009/7/10 Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Benedikt Gollatz a écrit :
>>
>>>> You need to accept proto-41
>>>> packets in the PREROUTING chain to stop the connection tracker from
>>>> looking at them.
>>>
>>> Wrong. Connection tracking happens anyway.
>>
>> You'll have to tell that to the authors of the SixXS FAQ.
>
> Maybe. I just read the FAQ entry about connection tracking, and I didn't
> think it was so clueless about Linux conntrack. But I'm so lazy, and SixXS
> puts so many requirements about how to contact them.
>
>>> Anyway what David need is to allow 6in4 traffic from the tunnel endpoint.
>>> This has nothing to do with connection tracking.
>>
>> Traffic passing through at first and after a certain time not being able
>> to
>> pass anymore is a classic symptom of problems with connection tracking.
>
> It less about connection tracking than about how connection tracking states
> are used in filtering rules. Connection tracking does not matter if you
> accept all traffic. So it is a mostly a filtering issue.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux