On Wednesday 2008-07-30 09:25, Massimiliano Hofer wrote: >On Sunday 27 July 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> >But there's a problem: there's no overall license file, and a lot of >> >the source files don't have license statements in them. Here are the >> >source files I find with no license: >> > >> >extensions/libxt_condition.c >> >> (Stephane and Massimiliano) > >No problem for me. I agree on the GPLv2 for my code. > >I just supposed it was implicit, since my code is tied to a GPLv2 project. It is not explicit at all, since "GPL", as it stands, may also mean "whatever existed at the time the project was conceived, or any later [gpl] version", IOW, v2+. Is that ok? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
