Re: "DNAT" w/o changing source address?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> That is very odd.  Do you have other rules in place that could be 
> interfering with what you are doing?

I have a dozen or so other rules that do the same thing for different
IP's (this is a load balancer).  

> Normally with a server behind a NAT all I need to do is DNAT the traffic 
> and allow the returning traffic to pass back out through the same NATing 
> system and allow it's outbound MASQUERADEing / SNAT to hide the internal 
> source IP address.

Well I thought that's what I was doing with that SNAT rule. =)

> If you do not have this type of scenario but rather both the redirecting 
> IP and the real mail server's IP are both globally routable, then you 
> may need to do something else.  Is this possibly the case?

Yeah, both machines have globally routable IP's.

John




-- 
John Madden
Sr. UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux