Grant Taylor a écrit :
Let me re-layout the network including IP addresses.
(INet [A.B.C.Z]) --- (BRouter [A.B.C.D]) --- ([A.B.C.E] Server(s)
[192.168.144.254] --- ([192.168.144.1-100])
Here you can see that you have the same subnet of A.B.C.x on both sides
of the bridging router.
Now I see. But wouldn't it be worth subnetting A.B.C.x ?
There is no good (read easy) way to have the
same subnet on multiple sides of a router
Do you mean that ARP proxy would not be a good way ? Ok, I guess it
would disrupt IP broadcasts a bit...
short of double natting which
in and of its self is not easy to do on a singular box.
Anyway NAT is evil. Don't use unless you can't avoid it.
