Re: NAT POSTROUTING accounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kamal írta:
On 10/15/06, Martijn Lievaart <m@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Create a seperate rule in FORWARD that jumps to an empty chain. Put this
rule before the -m state rule(s).

I will try to guess that by FORWARD you mean the filter FORWARD chain
(as opposed to mangle FORWARD), & the empty chain that you're
referring to is a user-defined chain,
but I didn't get what you eman by "the -m state rule" since in my
example I didn't use the state module.

But in any case, doesn't the FORWARD chain only accounts for forwarded
packets through the machine. What about locally generated packets?

Thanks


Maybe you can use the mangle POSTROUTING chain...

Swifty



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux