Re: More question about ipset - protocol ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Ming-Ching Tiew :
> I still have more questions with ipset, I noticed that in the
> portmap, there is no mentioned of protocol, whether should it be
> tcp or udp. Taking the example from the url :-
>
> http://ipset.netfilter.org/features.html
>
> iptables -A FORWARD -m set --set servers dst,dst -j ACCEPT iptables
> -A FORWARD -j DROP
>
> You notice that the ipmap 'server' binds to a portmap, but there is
>  no mentioned of protocol ( whether it should be tcp or udp ).
>
> Does it mean I have to specify the protocol in the iptables
> command, Shoudn't there be a way the protocol be mentioned in the
> binding somewhere  ?
Ip and the port can determine a package , why you need protocol ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFFMysu7tZp58UCwyMRAlnVAKDWKKw8I3KYLzSUzJpqttopyFX0MgCg1z8I
bhvgoiUxyfrs/ht4HlXW/u0=
=HoXR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux