Here is the related Bugzilla who direct the needed ones to netfilter! Bugzilla Bug 145642: iptables ROUTE target does not work https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145642#c3 -D --- dave <ceek63@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I use redhat kernel 2.4.x and looks like I need to > rebuild the kernel if I want to use ROUTE target? > > None of the iptables' rpms for fedora/redhat distro > contain libipt_ROUTE.so. > > What is best way to incorporate ROUTE target in > my situation? > > -D > > > --- Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I use kernel 2.4.x. > > > I need to do port forwarding to a remote host > AND > > to > > > pass these packets to a local application. > > > > > > I used the DNAT feature in iptables and it does > > the > > > port forwarding. But the issue is that these > > forwarded > > > packets are unreachable to local application. > > > > Of course, you just changed the IP address to > > something else than your > > own box. With DNAT, you explicitly 'give' up the > > connection for the > > local host. > > > > > > > > Any tips about proper iptables' rules to > > accomplish both? > > > > Apart from writing your own target extensions, I > > know of none. Might use > > ipt_ROUTE as a base, it contains a --tee option. > > > > > > Jan Engelhardt > > -- > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
