I use redhat kernel 2.4.x and looks like I need to rebuild the kernel if I want to use ROUTE target? None of the iptables' rpms for fedora/redhat distro contain libipt_ROUTE.so. What is best way to incorporate ROUTE target in my situation? -D --- Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I use kernel 2.4.x. > > I need to do port forwarding to a remote host AND > to > > pass these packets to a local application. > > > > I used the DNAT feature in iptables and it does > the > > port forwarding. But the issue is that these > forwarded > > packets are unreachable to local application. > > Of course, you just changed the IP address to > something else than your > own box. With DNAT, you explicitly 'give' up the > connection for the > local host. > > > > > Any tips about proper iptables' rules to > accomplish both? > > Apart from writing your own target extensions, I > know of none. Might use > ipt_ROUTE as a base, it contains a --tee option. > > > Jan Engelhardt > -- > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
