Re: Hardly loaded machines and iptables? Your experiences?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Eric for this article about benchmark testing.

And of course for opinion :).

PS: 1000 hits per minute for my case.

Regards



--- Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Le samedi 02 septembre 2006 à 10:48 -0700, Elvir
> Kuric a écrit :
> > Hi all, 
> > How that works in  environment with many
> > reqestes to servers in the LAN, I mean about 10000
> > request per day?
> 
> Per day are you sure ? or do you mean per second ?
> ;-)
> 10000 per day is completly out of scale compare to
> heavy loaded
> firewall.
> 
> > Have you experience about this topic.
> 
> Netfilter benchark document by kdlec is really good:
> http://people.netfilter.org/kadlec/nftest.pdf
> 
> 
> > What do you think is solution based on iptables
> enough
> > secure for mission critical cases? I just need
> your
> > frank opinion.
> 
> Clearly yes.
> 
> Don't forget that most of the firewall vendors
> (checkpoint for example)
> uses linux as OS. And almost all UTM are
> Linux/netfilter based.
> 
> BR,
> -- 
> Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx>
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux