I am so stupid, I didnt realize that by simply downloading the package that was the IPTABLES source directory, however when I run the runme it asks if i want to patch but when I say yes to any of them it tells me it is missing files.. Any ideas? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:25 PM Subject: RE: PATCH-O-MATIC (installation issue) > > I can find the kernerl source but I cannot seem to find the iptables > > source, and when I point it to the same location as my linux kernel > > it fails saying it doesnt know the IPTABLES source, does this make > > sense, and thank you for following up! > > Ah, yes you did write that.. Sorry about that. > All sources are separate packages. I don't know if you have installed > the iptables source. > However, I'd recommend to download the source of both iptables and POM > snapshots from the ftp site of the Netfilter project as you can download > more up-to-date sources. > > > Gr, > Rob > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:15 PM > > Subject: RE: PATCH-O-MATIC (installation issue) > > > > > >>> I am new to the forum so hopefully I am doing this right, I am > >>> trying to install PATCH-O-MATIC on either RedHat or CentOS but I > >>> dont know where the iptables source installation is, sorry if this > >>> is posted elsewhere.. > >> > >> If you installed the kernel source (it's a package), you probably > >> find it in /usr/src > >> > >> > >> Gr, > >> Rob > > > > -- > IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual > addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is > confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons > with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious > beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this email is not > authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an > irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been > used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it > does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be ignored. No > animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the > yorkshire terrier next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell > you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be > gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading > this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from > Microsoft: However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around > yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and > your pets. If you have received this email in error, please add some > nutmeg and egg whites and place it in a warm oven for 40 minutes. Whisk > briefly and let it stand for 2 hours before icing. > > >
