Yasuyuki KOZAKAI ha scritto:
Hi,
From: Undertacker <undertacker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:11:00 +0100
Dear All
I have some problem with applying a state match rules for ipv6 connections.
I’m using a debian unstable with 2.6.16-rc4 kernel.
This is my ipv6 configuration:(/etc/network/interfaces)
auto btexact00
iface btexact00 inet6 v4tunnel
address 2001:618:400:c23b:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
netmask 128
gateway fe80::d579:1855
endpoint 213.121.24.85
local 85.88.200.10
ttl 254
ipv6 allocation is 2001:618:400:c23b::/64
for now I’m using only a btexact00 interface for ipv6 output to internet.
there is also a second interface eth1 for LAN distribution of ipv6
support.
Sorry I'm not familiar with debian, but this box is router, isn't this ?
Uh… many people consider a router anything that making a connections…..
If you mean that, may answer is positive.
If you mean that the router is dedicated network hardware for management
of networking solutions, my answer is no.
This is a PC Intel based architecture wit Linux operation system 3
network interface card.
http://www.debian.org/
Debian uses the Linux kernel (the core of an operating system), but most
of the basic OS tools come from the GNU project; hence the name GNU/Linux..
It is not long that I’m using a linux ( just about 6 months) so please
forgive me if I done some stupid configuration.
this is my ip6tables configuration:
cat /etc/iptables.conf/ip6tables-roule.conf
# Generated by ip6tables-save v1.3.5 on Thu Feb 23 10:55:57 2006
*filter
:INPUT DROP [188:18904]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT DROP [9:728]
:btexact00_in - [0:0]
:btexact00_out - [0:0]
:eth1_in - [0:0]
:eth1_out - [0:0]
-A INPUT -s ::/0 -d ::/0 -i eth1 -j eth1_in
-A INPUT -s ::/0 -d ::/0 -i btexact00 -j btexact00_in
-A OUTPUT -s ::/0 -d ::/0 -o btexact00 -j btexact00_out
-A OUTPUT -s ::/0 -d ::/0 -o eth1 -j eth1_out
-A btexact00_in -s ::/0 -d ::/0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j
ACCEPT
-A btexact00_out -s 2001:618:400:c23b:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff/128 -d ::/0 -j
ACCEPT
COMMIT
# Completed on Thu Feb 23 10:55:57 2006
# Generated by ip6tables-save v1.3.5 on Thu Feb 23 10:55:57 2006
*mangle
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [195:19632]
:INPUT ACCEPT [195:19632]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [195:19784]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [186:19056]
COMMIT
# Completed on Thu Feb 23 10:55:57 2006
At first, this configuration will cause to drop ICMPv6 packets for
address autoconfiguration in your LAN if you run radvd on this box.
I suppose that.
But my intention for now is: use ipv6 directly from that machine, not
from the LAN
(I’ also don’t like the auto configuration of anything, so the network
connection I usually set manually)
finaly I came to my question:
for some kind of reason the roule:
-A btexact00_in -s ::/0 -d ::/0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j
ACCEPT
don’t match that king of traffic.
(if i add this roule after the up one : "-A btexact00_in -s ::/0 -d ::/0
-j LOG" log output all the traffic)
If this box is router and you want to use state match for forwareded
packets, you need to configure FORWARD chain.
And please "modprobe nf_conntrack_ipv6" manually. For some reason, it isn't
auto-loaded and we have to defer to improve this until 2.6.17.
UH.......
I' think that i have some king big problems because I can’t find
”nf_conntrack_ipv6”
hole:~# modprobe nf_conntrack_ipv6
FATAL: Module nf_conntrack_ipv6 not found.
hole:~# modprobe nf
nfnetlink nfnetlink_log nfnetlink_queue nfs nfsd nftl
But I’m quiet shure the I’select this kind of option in kernel
compilation as M (module), if this is a right place to select it.
If you have some suggestion how to solve?
I was tray several times to reconfigure all ip6tables supposing that
this was an configuration problem , but the configuration to me seems ok.
Please can you help me?
Best Regards
Undertacker
P.S.
I’m so sorry for my English, I hope you understand this mail.
-- Yasuyuki Kozakai
Thank you so much for answering me, as you see I’m not so expert in this…
Quoting a REM Lyrics - Losing My Religion.....
I'm Losing My Modules……
Best Regards Undertacker
