Re: updated iptables doesn't work with old rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> It mean your packet traversed the prerouting nat eth1, and so on.
>
> I would put 3 log messages, at "prerouting nat eth1", "forward", and
> "postrouting nat". If your packet is seen at postrouting then it should be
> successfully forwarded.
>
> I noticed that your packet's outbound interface is ppp0. However, I recall
> your
> MASQUERADE rule had "--out-interface eth0". Perhaps this is the cause and
> your
> packet is not masqueraded? Try a simple "iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -j
> MASQUERADE" without qualifiers.
>
> Other things to try. Use ethereal to sniff eth1, and eth0/ppp0. Is there
> traffic?
>
> Chinh
>

Hi Chinh, thank you very much again, I'll try your suggestions tonight.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux