Re: TCP_CONNTRACK_ESTABLISHED 5days

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor, Grant wrote:
Moritz, thanks for pointing that out.
Your suggested 10 minutes seems a bit short, though..


I would not set ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established to any thing lower than tcp_fin_timeout. I would be tempted to set ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established to approximately double what tcp_fin_timeout is set to. I don't know of any reason that conntrack would need to keep things for twice tcp_fin_timeout, but I'd rather be safe than sorry. Besides even double of tcp_fin_timeout is CONSIDERABLY less than 5 days.

Hmm, dunno if various distros set tcp_fin_timeout differently. With 2.6.10, it's 60 secs (not a distro kernel, and I didn't set this). Are you saying that Mouritz' 10mins will in some (distro?) cases violate ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established >= tcp_fin_timeout * 2 ?


Anyway, /usr/src/linux/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt says

tcp_fin_timeout
---------------
The length of time in seconds it takes to receive a final FIN before the socket is always closed. This is strictly a violation of the TCP
specification, but required to prevent denial-of-service attacks.



I'm having trouble understanding the 'strictly a violation' part. Is it a (iana) crime to define tcp_fin_timeout?

--
Kind regards,
Mogens Valentin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux