Re: RELATED ICMP packets of type 3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RELATED ICMP packets of type 3
From: Victor Julien <victor@xxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:41:19 +0100
In-reply-to: <20050211150635.GA2371@bender.817west.com>
Organization: Fr@nkonnections
References: <200502111757.16352.e-boogie@yandex.ru> <20050211150635.GA2371@bender.817west.com>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

> yes.  personally (for whatever that is worth), i allow ICMP Types 3, 11,
> and 12 [*].

Will these all be accepted by the accepting all RELATED packets? Or do i need 
extra rules to allow them?

Regards,
Victor

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RELATED ICMP packets of type 3
  - From: Jason Opperisano

References:
- RELATED ICMP packets of type 3
  - From: Mikhail Zotov
- Re: RELATED ICMP packets of type 3
  - From: Jason Opperisano

Prev by Date: Re: conntrack error
Next by Date: more limiting fun
Previous by thread: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: RELATED ICMP packets of type 3
Next by thread: Re: RELATED ICMP packets of type 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux