On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:51:59AM -0600, Stephen J Smoogen wrote: > Is there more publishing on Rober Olsson's benchmarks and findings. We > are doing various testing here and while the numbers look similar, I > would like to get an established testing methodology so that we can > confirm/help results from baseline tests. http://robur.slu.se/Linux/net-development/experiments/2004/ http://robur.slu.se/Linux/net-development/experiments/10G.html http://robur.slu.se/Linux/net-development/experiments/ > Our next line of testing is to find out which network cards will give us > the best bang for the buck on 10 gig testing. We currently have 300kpps > at 1 gig (E1000 + 2.4.2x kernel) but not sure if we are reaching the > limitations of the E1000 fibre optics or the PCI-X bus. 300kpps is bad, even for a 32bit/33MHz PCI bus, and definitely way too bad for any kind of PCI-X > Stephen John Smoogen | CCN-5 Security Team > LANL SIRT Team Leader | SMTP: smoogen@xxxxxxxx > Los Alamos National Laboratory | Voice: 505.664.0645 -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/ ============================================================================ "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
