Re: dnat problem in transparent firewall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> What do your LOGging rules say?   Is it possible that you are trying to LOG
> packets addressed to aaa.aaa.aaa.12, and therefore the rules no longer see
> the packets once the address has been changed to aaa.aaa.aaa.13?

That's a good point. I checket it also over several times.
Thats why I also tested and wrote, that I see packets if I try to connect to 
aaa.aaa.aaa.13

I added 2 logging rules for every logging point from a) to d).
For example exact logging rules for a) are :
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn -d aaa.aaa.aaa.12 -j LOG 
--log-prefix " ipt nat pre "
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn -d aaa.aaa.aaa.13 -j LOG 
--log-prefix " ipt nat pre "

where nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn is a computer from where I connect behind other ISP.

It should not be relevant, but the port I try to connect for testing right now 
is ssh. I try to connect with telnet aaa.aaa.aaa.12 22.
both .12 and .13 have ssh servers up and running.

Raido




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux