what are you talking about proofread...i didnt preface anything or put that subject: there so get your facts straight about who saw what on what thread...dont ass-u-me you know what anybody may have read. send it inline...our filters are VERY GOOD.....must of stripped'em. -----Original Message----- From: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Antony Stone Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 9:25 AM To: 'netfilter' Subject: Re: Proofreading On Wednesday 14 July 2004 5:10 pm, Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN wrote: > where is the ruleset. never saw it in any message traffic. It was attached to the original request for people to proofread it (if you didn't see the script, what did you proofread!?). 4.6k textfile called rc.iptables I've attached it again to this email so you can see it (I hope others on the list don't mind the duplicate posting - it's not a very long script...) Regards, Antony. > -----Original Message----- > From: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Antony Stone > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 5:13 AM > To: netfilter > Subject: Re: Proofreading > > On Wednesday 14 July 2004 1:00 pm, Erik Wikström wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:19:57PM -0700, Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 > > CS/SCBN > > wrote: > > > X...ports 6k --> at least 6100 > > > rpc... > > > nfs > > > > > > shall i go on. > > > > Please do. > > I don't quite understand this. Perhaps Hudson has not noticed the default > DROP policy in Erik's ruleset? > > Regards, > > Antony. -- I don't know, maybe if we all waited then cosmic rays would write all our software for us. Of course it might take a while. - Ron Minnich, Los Alamos National Laboratory Please reply to the list; please don't CC me.
