Re: Having NAT problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:19:45 +0100, Antony Stone wrote
> We don't mind if you obscure the IP addresses (so long as we can 
> still tell which is which...)
> 
> However, from what you have posted, I think the problem is that you 
> have no FORWARD rule to allow the DNATed packets through your firewall?
> 
> Oh, dear me, no - that's not it - you have a default ACCEPT policy 
> on your FORWARD chain (I'm not surprised you don't want to post your 
> public IP address to the list...)
> 
> Okay, how's this then  - please post all the rules which you think 
> are needed for this pcAnywhere setup to work (with suitable partial 
> obscuring of IPs if you wish).   Then we'll tell you if we can see 
> something missing?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Antony.

That's actually what I wound up doing in the last post. That's all the rules
on the box save for a few NAT entries which I just commented out. Commenting
them out and re-running the file didn't do anything. I'm at my wits end. 

--
Northern Indiana ESC
Adam Kennedy - akennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Specialist / Network Administrator
Phone: (574) 254-0111 x113
Toll Free: 800-326-5642
Fax: (574) 254-0148



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux