Re: IMQ Replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andre,

maybe interessting for you: Marcel Sebek recently started a thread
on netdev about this topic. He has ported the IMQ device to 2.6
and asked if this might be accepted. Davem contacted Patrick
McHardy, the original author, who said that the IMQ device was
buggy.
This thread still continues, take a look at netdev ml archives for
more information.

HTH

Sven

On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:16:55AM -0200, Andre Correa told us:
> 
> Hi guys, Andy F. pointed out that Alexander Clouter and other guys 
> ported IMQ to 2.6. The URL to their port is:
> 
> http://www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/#qos-2.6
> 
> I had no time or resources to test it so far...
> 
> I've got no answer from the last IMQ maintainer so I'll start a list for 
> us to discuss what we'll gonna do about it. I'll let you know later today.
> 
> I'm sorry if this thread is disturbing somebody in this list. I'll just 
> post 1 or 2 e-mails about it and we'll be out...
> 
> Meanwhile, anybody interrested in joining us to work with IMQ please 
> contact me privately.
> 
> tks...
> 
> Andre

-- 
Linux zion 2.6.1 #2 Mon Jan 12 14:25:44 CET 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
 15:38:04  up 13 days, 21:10,  5 users,  load average: 0.23, 0.12, 0.04

Attachment: pgp00738.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux