Re: IMQ Replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IMQ Replacement
From: Alex Satrapa <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:04:26 +1100
In-reply-to: <002301c3df40$30f4b3b0$6e69690a@RIMAS>
Organization: Lintelsys
References: <1068652569.27810.450.camel@cumulus> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311131244400.13900@fhynpb.envafyvqr.arg> <1074352525.4761.1389.camel@peterlaptop> <400BDCB6.2000208@pobox.com> <002301c3df40$30f4b3b0$6e69690a@RIMAS>
Reply-to: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030716 Debian/1.4-2.he-1

Remus wrote:

IMQ is great and have to be maintained, but myself I'm not strong with
programming.

But I can help with testing. If somebody can take care about IMQ (or new
project of it) would be very nice.

Add me to the list of people happy to be testers!

References:
- linux-2.4.22, iptables-1.2.9, imq
  - From: Josh Howlett
- Re: linux-2.4.22, iptables-1.2.9, imq
  - From: Vigil
- IMQ Replacement
  - From: Peter Frischknecht
- Re: IMQ Replacement
  - From: Andre Correa
- Re: IMQ Replacement
  - From: Remus

Prev by Date: Help: cvs download
Next by Date: Re: per-connection byte counts
Previous by thread: Re: IMQ Replacement
Next by thread: Re: IMQ Replacement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux