Re: FORWARD question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 21 November 2003 12:38 pm, Antony Stone wrote something completely 
stupid and sent it to the list.

I said "packets being routed do not go through FORWARD".   This completely 
wrong, and I should have said "packets being routed do not go through INPUT". 
They definitely do go through FORWARD.

Corrected version of my previous response below :)

> On Friday 21 November 2003 11:59 am, Nick wrote:
> > Antony, I thought I had it all figured out.
> > Apparently, I don't... :-(
> >
> > I thought it should be in INPUT so that the router
> > 'gets' the incoming request, and once it has it, it
> > will FORWARD it to the LAN server.
>
> No no no no no no no :))

Packets being routed do not go through INPUT (you didn't used to use
ipchains, did you?   Your idea is the way that system used to work...)

> > Now, if this rule should be in the FORWARD, what
> > should I have in INPUT in order to acept NEW FTP
> > requests ? Or is FORWARD doing this automatically ?
>
> See
> http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html#TRAVERSINGOFT
>ABLES
>
> > I promised that the previous message would be the last
> > one. Sorry for breaking my promise :-)
>
> No problem.   You'll probably have another one in a week or so, when you
> want to do something even more exciting :)
>
> Antony.

-- 

How should I know if it works?   That's what beta testers are for.   I only 
coded it.

 - Linus Torvalds
                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux