Ingo Oeser wrote:
On Friday 10 October 2003 15:00, David S. Miller wrote:
Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Would you mind __attribute_nonnull__ for these functions, if we
enable GCC 3.3 support for this[1]?
I would say yes, but why? All this attribute does is optimize
away tests for NULL which surprise surprise we don't have any
of in kfree_skb().
And it wouldn't warn about passing NULL to these functions? That's bad...
But maybe sparse/smatch are better for this...
Things like smatch, sparse, and checker can use the __attribute_nonnull__.
I'd say it's a good idea. Should I submit the patch, then, since I'm
the one who like the idea?
- Dan
--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
