Re: logging mac address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: George Vieira <georgev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: logging mac address
From: Ramin Dousti <ramin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:24:51 -0400
Cc: Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster <aforster@xxxxxxxxxx>, netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <09B04A55822EFF4DA48D2E0BB2941D4A0192BE@wardrive.citadelcomputer.com.au>
References: <09B04A55822EFF4DA48D2E0BB2941D4A0192BE@wardrive.citadelcomputer.com.au>
Sender: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:23:38AM +1000, George Vieira wrote:

> >>It makes sense though that you don't get that in FORWARD since the routing
> decision has not yet been made.
> 
> Sorry, that's not true, routing decision HAS been made

Absolutely. This was my nonsense of the day...

References:
- RE: logging mac address
  - From: George Vieira

Prev by Date: Re: iptables 1.2.8 libc6 question
Next by Date: Re: DNAT/SNAT & existing connections
Previous by thread: RE: logging mac address
Next by thread: Problems with Linux Firewall
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux