On Thu, 15 May 2003 21:46:17 +0200, "P.Italiaander" <pc-secure@xxxxxxx> wrote in message <200305152146.17228.pc-secure@xxxxxxx>: > Op donderdag 15 mei 2003 19:48, schreef u: > > On Thu, 15 May 2003 17:42:26 +0200, > > "P.Italiaander" <pc-secure@xxxxxxx> wrote in message > > > > <200305151742.26913.pc-secure@xxxxxxx>: > > > Op donderdag 15 mei 2003 14:52, schreef Arnt Karlsen: > > > > ..I know, ipup _is_ buggy, my hint was more on Red Hats somewhat > > > > sloppy QA attitude. I mean, if I should _not_ use RH9 to route > > > > traffic, I would like to know _that_ from the docs. > > > > > > > > ..does Mandrake or Debian turn their rear end onto _whoever_ > > > > like RH-9 does in > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 ??? > > > > > > I've checked , but Mandrake 9.1 is not effected with that bug. > > > Thanks for mention it. > > > On Debian i don't know ,don't have it , i use OpenBSD en Linux > > > SuSe , Redhat ,Mandrake. > > > > > > Does anyone have tested yet, my patched /sbin/ifup file, for > > > iptables-script ?? > > > > ..the wifi part of it works fine, but it _introduces_ bug # 89171, > > I tested with a thinkpad 760 ED I use as AP, it runs RH-7.3. > > > > ..it looks like Red Hat cannot use mac addresses to ID nics. > > > hmm... , I really thought ,that after my update , this shoud be fixed > ?? since syntax is changed. > I 've looked but can't find patch anywhere , do you have one ? > ..me too. ;-) I'll mail you what I have off-list. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
