On Thu, 15 May 2003 17:42:26 +0200, "P.Italiaander" <pc-secure@xxxxxxx> wrote in message <200305151742.26913.pc-secure@xxxxxxx>: > Op donderdag 15 mei 2003 14:52, schreef Arnt Karlsen: > > > ..I know, ipup _is_ buggy, my hint was more on Red Hats somewhat > > sloppy QA attitude. I mean, if I should _not_ use RH9 to route > > traffic, I would like to know _that_ from the docs. > > > > ..does Mandrake or Debian turn their rear end onto _whoever_ like > > RH-9 does in > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 ??? > > > I've checked , but Mandrake 9.1 is not effected with that bug. > Thanks for mention it. > On Debian i don't know ,don't have it , i use OpenBSD en Linux SuSe , > Redhat ,Mandrake. > > Does anyone have tested yet, my patched /sbin/ifup file, for > iptables-script ?? ..the wifi part of it works fine, but it _introduces_ bug # 89171, I tested with a thinkpad 760 ED I use as AP, it runs RH-7.3. ..it looks like Red Hat cannot use mac addresses to ID nics. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
