On Thu, 15 May 2003 02:15:56 +0200, "P.Italiaander" <pc-secure@xxxxxxx> wrote in message <200305150215.56631.pc-secure@xxxxxxx>: > Op woensdag 14 mei 2003 23:16, schreef Arnt Karlsen: > > On Wed, 14 May 2003 21:55:31 +0200, > > "P.Italiaander" <pc-secure@xxxxxxx> wrote in message > > > > <200305142155.31623.pc-secure@xxxxxxx>: > > > hello all , > > > > > > I have just installed the new Mandrake 9.1 as workstation , and i > > > had to adjust the ifup script ,since i use internal, an > > > dhcp-server.So it automaticaly adapt the /etc/hosts file. > > > But to my suprise , i saw that the ifup script , still is written > > > for ipchains !!!! THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE > > > So i will correct it the iptables-script , when it's done > > > i'll send a copy , for other Mandrake or RedHat users , maybe come > > > handy > > > > > > Pascal > > > > ..heh, check out > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 > > > > ...but there _is_ hope for RH: > > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-172.html is appearantly > > serious enough to get Red Hat to drop their > > no-upgrade-to-match-newest-vanilla policy, _all_ supported RH > > versions are asked to go to 2.4.20-13. > > > Sorry friend , your information is usefill , but it's not about what I > 've said before. ..I know, ipup _is_ buggy, my hint was more on Red Hats somewhat sloppy QA attitude. I mean, if I should _not_ use RH9 to route traffic, I would like to know _that_ from the docs. ..does Mandrake or Debian turn their rear end onto _whoever_ like RH-9 does in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 ??? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
