in what ways is this better then heartbeat? -----Original Message----- From: Steve Mickeler [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:39 PM To: Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster Cc: Chip Upsal; netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Using heartbeat for fall over on IPTables Firewall I'll second the vote for keepalived. Its an amazing tool. http://www.keepalived.org/ On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Antonio Paulo Salgado Forster wrote: > > Suggestion: Try using keepalived instead. > > Regards, > > Forster > > > Chip Upsal <cupsal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>@lists.netfilter.org on 03/17/2003 > 01:16:46 PM > > Sent by: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'linux-ha@xxxxxx'" <linux-ha@xxxxxx> > cc: > Subject: Using heartbeat for fall over on IPTables Firewall > > > > I am looking to use heartbeat to provide fall over for my iptables > firewall. > I am looking for those with experience using these tools together. > > I plan to use RH7.2 on the firewalls. > > I made some attempts at implementing such a solution but i ran into a few > problems. > > I would like suggestions on setup of the heartbeat configuration files. > Pointers on the iptables startup script. and advice on what kernel version > to use and if any patches need to be applied. > > Thanks in advance, > > Chip > > > > > Chip Upsal > SysAdmin > CyberWolf Inc > > > > >
