oh, yeah sorry i was too excited! :) I actually re-check my cisco router that is 10.0.0.2 (which is connected on my hub, it was configured to access straight 192.168.129.x/24 block). Now 10.0.0.2's subnet is actually set wrong, subnet was a /24 (255.255.255.0) i just remember im using /16 (255.255.0.0). I re-change the mask and re-add another route to 192.168.129.x via 10.0.0.2 on the linuxgw /sbin/route add -net 192.168.129.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 10.0.0.2 now again i can ping 192.168.129.x from my linuxgw and still no respond from the ws (work stations). I add another rule that will forwarded all 10.0.0/16 (workstations) /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -s 10.0.0.0/16 -i eth1 -j ACCEPT and test it. It worked! :) -- thanks, louie miranda ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arnt Karlsen" <arnt@c2i.net> To: "louie miranda" <lmiranda@chikka.com> Cc: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 8:23 PM Subject: Re: managing another network route, can't connect to it! Pls see! > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:20:44 +0800, > "louie miranda" <lmiranda@chikka.com> top posted, _and_ mailed, > in message <01ce01c2de30$be8a3400$0b00000a@nocpc3>: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "louie miranda" <lmiranda@Chikka.com> > > To: "Arnt Karlsen" <arnt@c2i.net>; <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> > > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:20 AM > > Subject: Re: managing another network route, can't connect to it! Pls > > see! > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Arnt Karlsen" <arnt@c2i.net> > > > To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:04 PM > > > Subject: Re: managing another network route, can't connect to it! > > > Pls see! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ..'info ifconfig', you wanna do 'ifconfig eth1:0 192.168.129.254 > > > > up' or somesuch, on your gw. The new boxes on that net needs to > > > > know where to go, too. > > > > > > Arnt, > > > > > > Hi.. > > > > > > I already add another ip over my gw w/c is 192.168.129.50 and point > > > the route to 10.0.0.2. On my WS there's still no response when i go > > > to 192.168.129.x block. But i can ping 192.168.129.50 ip. > > > > > > What else could be possibly be missing? > > > > > ..Louie, what _was_ missing? (I like to know whether I missed > something in advicing you, etc, also toss in "Solved" in the > subject of the thank-you message when you explain _how_ it was > fixed, etc, more people might need this info.) > > > -- > ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) > ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... > Scenarios always come in sets of three: > best case, worst case, and just in case. > > >
